Design a Logo for a Children's Youtube Show

Color and relevancy is great, but the proportions are off with the size of the type and the symbol, and the "s" on "Nats" is way too far off, it's confusing.

I like the character, but it's more of a character design as opposed to the logo -- and what really kills it is the type that overlaps the character.

Not bad, but the character is a little bit bland and unrefined with the hair shape which is clearly a little bit chopped up and not based on perfect circles and angles.

I prefer the other one above that you did, because things are a bit too jumbled here. Thanks.

If you truly designed that character yourself and didn't pull it from some other source, that is impressive. However in terms of logo design, it's a bit too complex for it to be truly effective. Thanks!

Not bad, but the symbol is a bit too abstract and lacks connection with the purpose of the youtube channel -- it is close. I still like everything else about it though..

It's pretty hard to read "NATS" and proportionally "Picks" is much too small compared to "NATS". It would get lost and unreadable at smaller sizes.

I would stick to just 1 color if your thinking of using slightly different shades. And the biggest issue is the complexity here. You're trying to convey way too much in this logo; it needs to be simplified by 10x! The type as well, a bit too much happening there. Thanks.

I'm usually fine with gradients, but when they're applied uniquely to each individual character, it becomes a bit much. Also, this sort of lacks relevancy.

Did you hand draw that yourself? Also, the colors seem a bit faded out, and there's heavy pixelation occurring. And the type overlapping the character design isn't ideal + the very elaborate butterfly is too much when joined with the character.

This gets low scores because you want to avoid intricate detail (the butterfly reflection and the many sparkles -- completely unnecessary, the logo becomes better without them). Also, the slight change of hue (pink/purple) doesn't contrast enough.

Not much to judge here, because it's just a font with no other symbolism or anything uniquely applied to it. Sorry!

I like the actual symbolism designed, but you've added too many. I would focus on just using one symbol, as opposed to have 4 separate elements - The type could also use work, the "s" is completely separated.

This has potential, but I would use a more simple typeface. It would almost become lost at smaller sizes. I would opt for a thick, rounded, sans-serif font.